Compare platforms

CodeCanyon vs npm

Side-by-side comparison of licensing terms between CodeCanyon and npm.

License Comparison

Hover or tap any field name to see what it means. Highlighted rows indicate differences.

CodeCanyon:
C
CodeCanyon
Regular License
n
npm
Free (Public Registry)
Price
Per-item, from $3
Free

Prices may vary by region and are subject to change.

Download
Yes
Yes
Commercial Use
Regular License covers use in one end product that is not sold to multiple users. SaaS or resold products require Extended License.
Depends on each package's license field in package.json. MIT (most common) allows commercial use. GPL allows commercial use but requires open-sourcing derivatives. Some packages are proprietary.
Editing
Yes
Depends on the package license. MIT, Apache, and ISC allow modification. GPL allows modification with share-alike requirements.
Attribution
No
Nice to
Exclusive Rights
No
No
Redistribution
Cannot redistribute the source code. End product must not allow extraction of the original code.
Depends on the package license. Most open-source licenses allow redistribution with conditions.
Print Use
Yes
Depends on package license. Rarely relevant for code packages.
Digital Use
Yes
Depends on package license. Most open-source licenses allow digital use.
Client Work
Licensed for one end product for one client. Using the same item for multiple clients requires separate licenses.
Depends on package license. MIT and Apache allow client work. GPL may require clients to open-source their code.
Survives Cancellation
Forever
Forever
CodeCanyon:

Regular license covers ONE end product only. Using the same item in multiple projects or for multiple clients requires additional licenses.

Extended license is required for SaaS, subscription products, or any end product where users are charged. Regular license does not cover these use cases.

npm:

Always check the 'license' field in package.json before using a package. MIT is the most common but not universal - some packages are GPL, proprietary, or have no license specified.

Packages with no license field or 'UNLICENSED' are all rights reserved. You may not have the right to use them in your projects.

Key Differences

Fields where these platforms differ

Commercial Use

CodeCanyon:
npm:~Depends on each package's license field in package.json. MIT (most common) allows commercial use. GPL allows commercial use but requires open-sourcing derivatives. Some packages are proprietary.

Editing

CodeCanyon:
npm:~Depends on the package license. MIT, Apache, and ISC allow modification. GPL allows modification with share-alike requirements.

Attribution

CodeCanyon:Not required
npm:Varies

Redistribution

CodeCanyon:
npm:~Depends on the package license. Most open-source licenses allow redistribution with conditions.

Print Use

CodeCanyon:
npm:~Depends on package license. Rarely relevant for code packages.

Digital Use

CodeCanyon:
npm:~Depends on package license. Most open-source licenses allow digital use.

Client Work

CodeCanyon:
npm:~Depends on package license. MIT and Apache allow client work. GPL may require clients to open-source their code.

Indemnification

CodeCanyon:~Envato provides limited buyer protection through marketplace terms.
npm:

Refund Policy

CodeCanyon:~Refunds available within 30 days if the item is materially different from its description or has a technical defect.
npm:

Popular Comparisons

Informational Only - Not Legal Advice

LicenseOrg provides informational summaries of platform license terms for educational purposes only. This is not legal advice. Always consult the platform’s official license page and a qualified legal professional.

Exclusive perks for members

Join Our Community

Get early access to new features, plus exclusive deals and coupons from top creative platforms.